Re: Transaction start in pg_stat_activity

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "pgsql-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Transaction start in pg_stat_activity
Date: 2006-11-20 15:58:02
Message-ID: 6940.1164038282@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Great idea. Would it be appropriate to show the time the current
> snapshot was taken also/instead?

There is no way we are putting a gettimeofday() call into
GetSnapshotData. I thought you were focused on performance??

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-11-20 16:08:03 Re: Accessing shared memory in a proc_exit callback
Previous Message Markus Schiltknecht 2006-11-20 15:35:25 Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2006-11-20 16:25:11 Re: Transaction start in pg_stat_activity
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-11-20 10:02:27 Re: Transaction start in pg_stat_activity