Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.3.8 on AIX5.3 : compilation failed

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Alexandra Roy *EXTERN* <Alexandra(dot)Roy(at)bull(dot)net>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.3.8 on AIX5.3 : compilation failed
Date: 2009-11-10 22:36:50
Message-ID: 6938.1257892610@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> In most of the other cases the #include is done in an associated .y
>> file, but there is none in psql. Anyone have a thought which of
>> psql's .c files would be the most appropriate host?

> mainloop.c?

Yeah, that's about the same conclusion I had come to --- that's
the principal caller so it's the closest analog to what we do
elsewhere.

Will fix.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-11-10 23:15:19 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.3.8 on AIX5.3 : compilation failed
Previous Message akp geek 2009-11-10 22:25:15 Re: Incremental Backups in postgres

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-11-10 23:15:19 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.3.8 on AIX5.3 : compilation failed
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-11-10 21:43:15 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.3.8 on AIX5.3 : compilation failed