Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Date: 2019-02-10 01:41:06
Message-ID: 6932.1549762866@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2019-Feb-09, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Uh-huh. And what happens after DETACH PARTITION ... are you going to run
>> around and recreate these triggers?

> Yep, that's there too.

OK, then I guess it's fine.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2019-02-10 01:57:08 Re: query logging of prepared statements
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-02-10 01:26:59 Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)