Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch pg_is_in_backup()

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch pg_is_in_backup()
Date: 2012-02-03 09:10:11
Message-ID: 691525170451D3F76CEF7ED1@apophis.local (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--On 3. Februar 2012 13:21:11 +0900 Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> It seems to be more user-friendly to introduce a view like pg_stat_backup
> rather than the function returning an array.

I like this idea. A use case i saw for monitoring backup_label's in the past, 
was mainly to discover a forgotten exclusive pg_stop_backup() (e.g. due to 
broken backup scripts). If the view would be able to distinguish both, 
exclusive and non-exclusive backups, this would be great.



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2012-02-03 09:47:55
Subject: Re: Patch pg_is_in_backup()
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2012-02-03 09:06:01
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix float8 parsing of denormal values (on some platforms?)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group