Re: bloated heapam.h

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bloated heapam.h
Date: 2008-05-10 21:10:45
Message-ID: 6911.1210453845@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> The one that makes a bit more sense is a new syncscan.h. And there are
> a lot of things in heapam.h that actually correspond to tuple
> manipulation (heap_form_tuple and so on), so perhaps a new header file
> would be appropriate, but there's already htup.h which contains
> tuple-related stuff.

After actually looking at the header a bit ...

+1 for moving fastgetattr, heap_getattr, and the heaptuple.c functions
to htup.h. I don't see any big gain from relocating the other stuff;
it seems to largely all use about the same set of typedefs.

It looks to me actually that a large part of your complaint is that
heapam.h #includes more than it has to. Have you tried just cutting its
#include list to the minimum needed to compile its function declarations?
Likely this would force more #includes in .c files but I don't object
to that. (I might be wrong, but I believe that Bruce's script for
removing "unnecessary" #includes is not bright enough to make such
tradeoffs, so it'd let bloated #include lists in headers survive.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2008-05-10 21:15:10 Re: Setting a pre-existing index as a primary key
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-05-10 19:26:16 Re: bloated heapam.h