Re: Deadlock with ShareLocks?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Deadlock with ShareLocks?
Date: 2005-12-13 16:04:34
Message-ID: 6902.1134489874@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com> writes:
> I guess two backends might have issued interleaved updates.
> I think without logging this cannot be solved here.

Yeah, it's annoying that there is no convenient way to see the contents
of pg_locks at the instant of the deadlock. Knowing which tuple locks
were held would give at least some additional information.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Francisco Figueiredo Jr. 2005-12-13 16:48:41 Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bug] Server Crash, possible security exploit,
Previous Message Mario Weilguni 2005-12-13 15:57:54 Re: Deadlock with ShareLocks?