Re: Executing pg_createsubscriber with a non-compatible control file

From: Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Executing pg_createsubscriber with a non-compatible control file
Date: 2025-10-20 08:35:49
Message-ID: 68f5f465.5d0a0220.2e7079.db90@mx.google.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 09:54:52AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2025 at 08:55:35AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > With the addition of the version check in the binary, there is no
> > downside in documenting this requirement.
>
> Okay, I have added a note about that in the docs, then applied your
> patch on HEAD. Thanks!

Thank you!

Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-10-20 08:38:14 Re: Random pg_upgrade 004_subscription test failure on drongo
Previous Message Chao Li 2025-10-20 08:34:14 Re: Use CompactAttribute more often, when possible