Re: Add support for specifying tables in pg_createsubscriber.

From: "Euler Taveira" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
To: "Amit Kapila" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Peter Smith" <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "'Shubham Khanna'" <khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com>, "vignesh C" <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add support for specifying tables in pg_createsubscriber.
Date: 2025-09-12 12:53:17
Message-ID: 68de5fe2-0ddd-4d59-aeb7-6f1e87254ca6@app.fastmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 12, 2025, at 2:05 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Yeah, I am also not sure that it is worth adding a new option to save
> backward compatibility for this option. It seems intuitive to use
> existing publications when they exist, though we should clearly
> document it.
>

That's why we have a "Migration to Version XY" in the release notes. ;)

--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-09-12 13:41:18 Re: misleading error message in ProcessUtilitySlow T_CreateStatsStmt
Previous Message Holger Hoffstätte 2025-09-12 12:47:34 Re: [PATCH] jit: fix build with LLVM-21