From: | Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Frits Hoogland <frits(dot)hoogland(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: The ability of postgres to determine loss of files of the main fork |
Date: | 2025-10-01 12:15:52 |
Message-ID: | 68dd1b79.170a0220.3c4175.198f@mx.google.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 02:05:53PM +0200, Jakub Wartak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2025 at 1:46 PM Aleksander Alekseev
> <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com> wrote:
> > > IMHO all files should be opened at least on startup to check
> > > integrity,
I would say s/startup/crash recovery/, if any.
> > That might be a lot of files to open.
>
> I was afraid of that, but let's say modern high-end is 200TB big DB,
> that's like 200*1024 1GB files, but I'm getting such time(1) timings
> for 204k files on ext4:
>
> $ time ./createfiles # real 0m2.157s, it's
> open(O_CREAT)+close()
> $ time ls -l many_files_dir/ > /dev/null # real 0m0.734s
> $ time ./openfiles # real 0m0.297s , for
> already existing ones (hot)
> $ time ./openfiles # real 0m1.456s , for
> already existing ones (cold, echo 3 > drop_caches sysctl)
>
> Not bad in my book as a one time activity. It could pose a problem
> potentially with some high latency open() calls, maybe NFS or
> something remote I guess.
Yeah, did you try on SAN as well? I am doubtful that will be performant.
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2025-10-01 12:17:50 | RE: Patch for migration of the pg_commit_ts directory |
Previous Message | Frits Hoogland | 2025-10-01 12:15:06 | Re: The ability of postgres to determine loss of files of the main fork |