From: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: MAIN, Uncompressed? |
Date: | 2017-08-26 04:40:36 |
Message-ID: | 68cfe3ce-7ed8-e4ff-d6aa-262ccdf5fa21@catalyst.net.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 26/08/17 12:18, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 25 August 2017 at 20:53, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
>>> I think this is a particularly old piece of code and we're lucky the
>>> default heuristics have served well for all this time because I doubt
>>> many people fiddle with these storage attributes. The time may have
>>> come to come up with a better UI for the storage attributes because
>>> people are doing new things (like json) and wanting more control over
>>> this heuristic.
>> Yeah, I could get behind a basic rethinking of the tuptoaster control
>> knobs. I'm just not in love with Simon's specific proposal, especially
>> not if we can't think of a better name for it than "MAINU".
> Extended/External would be just fine if you could set the toast
> target, so I think a better suggestion would be to make "toast_target"
> a per-attribute option .
>
+1, have thought about this myself previously....thank you for bringing
it up!
regards
Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | yangjie@highgo.com | 2017-08-26 04:40:39 | hash partitioning based on v10Beta2 |
Previous Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2017-08-26 03:34:20 | Re: Pluggable storage |