pg_* Tables

From: Samuel Stearns <SStearns(at)internode(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: pg_* Tables
Date: 2010-12-06 02:40:49
Message-ID: 68B59BEDCD36854AADBDF17E91B2937A07844CCA60@EXCHMAIL.staff.internode.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Howdy,

Environment:

Solaris 10
Postgres 8.3.3

I'm getting high sequential scans for some pg_* tables:

<database>=# select relname, sum(seq_scan) as seq_scan,sum(seq_tup_read) as seq_tup_read,sum(idx_scan) as idx_scan, sum(idx_tup_fetch) as idx_tup_fetch, sum(n_tup_ins) as n_tup_ins, sum(n_tup_upd) as n_tup_upd, sum(n_tup_del) as n_tup_del from pg_stat_all_tables group by 1 order by 2 desc limit 4;
relname | seq_scan | seq_tup_read | idx_scan | idx_tup_fetch | n_tup_ins | n_tup_upd | n_tup_del
---------------------------------+----------+--------------+----------+---------------+-----------+-----------+-----------
<table> | 6896498 | 91295702 | 107663 | 469057 | 103966 | 103966 | 103966
pg_authid | 3119053 | 125950392 | 12000732 | 12000718 | 1 | 1 | 0
pg_am | 2642438 | 2642440 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0
pg_database | 1349020 | 14771768 | 6953392 | 6953392 | 0 | 0 | 0
(4 rows)

<database>=#

Is this normal? Is it advisable to index pg_* tables?

Thank you,

Sam

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Williamson 2010-12-06 07:03:51 Re: pg_* Tables
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-12-05 23:14:00 Re: failing to compile v. 9.0.1 on debian squeeze with readline