Re: Fix doc bug in logical replication.

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix doc bug in logical replication.
Date: 2019-06-23 17:25:26
Message-ID: 68843559-1d78-122b-d84a-2171f5a76c40@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-04-12 19:52, Robert Treat wrote:
> It is clear to me that the docs are wrong, but I don't see anything
> inherently incorrect about the code itself. Do you have suggestions
> for how you would like to see the code comments improved?

The question is perhaps whether we want to document that non-matching
data types do work. It happens to work now, but do we always want to
guarantee that? There is talk of a binary mode for example.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2019-06-23 17:56:53 Re: Multivariate MCV stats can leak data to unprivileged users
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-06-23 17:21:02 Re: check_recovery_target_lsn() does a PG_CATCH without a throw