Re: ON CONFLICT DO SELECT (take 3)

From: Viktor Holmberg <v(at)viktorh(dot)net>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ON CONFLICT DO SELECT (take 3)
Date: 2025-11-10 10:18:54
Message-ID: 6852c996-a786-464f-bd5d-ea63530ca12d@Spark
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ah, must’ve been that I added the previous thread for referene on the commitfest entry. Thanks for sorting that out.
Looking forward to your review!

/Viktor
On 10 Nov 2025 at 10:21 +0100, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2025 at 12:57, Viktor Holmberg <v(at)viktorh(dot)net> wrote:
> >
> > This patch implements ON CONFLICT DO SELECT.
> > I’ve kept the patches proposed there separate, in case any of the people involved back then would like to pick it up again.
> >
> > Grateful in advance to anyone who can help reviewing!
>
> Thanks for picking this up. I haven't looked at it yet, but I'm
> planning to do so.
>
> In the meantime, I noticed that the cfbot didn't pick up your latest
> patches, and is still running the v7 patches, presumably based on
> their names. So here they are as v8 (rebased, plus a couple of
> indentation fixes in 0003, but no other changes).
>
> Regards,
> Dean

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2025-11-10 10:22:23 Re: Change COPY ... ON_ERROR ignore to ON_ERROR ignore_row
Previous Message shveta malik 2025-11-10 09:31:01 Re: Improve pg_sync_replication_slots() to wait for primary to advance