From: | Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage |
Date: | 2025-06-09 15:40:50 |
Message-ID: | 68470082.050a0220.2e3c98.49cc@mx.google.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 10:25:23AM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> I think our policy basically is that if it doesn't exist on the BF, it's
> unsupported. Also note that Hurd is not listed as a supported OS:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/supported-platforms.html
>
> We can't design for OS that we don't know it's used with postgres and/or how
> that OS works / what it supports.
>
> So I reject the premise that this is a regression.
Fair enough. I'll see whether I can get a BF animal going for it at some
point.
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florents Tselai | 2025-06-09 15:54:16 | Re: Feature: psql - display current search_path in prompt |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2025-06-09 15:34:14 | Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN |