Re: tighten generic_option_name, or store more carefully in catalog?

From: Chapman Flack <jcflack(at)acm(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tighten generic_option_name, or store more carefully in catalog?
Date: 2025-06-02 18:43:49
Message-ID: 683DF0E5.1040905@acm.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/02/25 14:13, Tom Lane wrote:
> Here's a proposed patch for the "=" issue. Whether or not we should
> rethink FDW validation behavior, doing so surely couldn't be
> back-patched. But I think this much should be.

LGTM
Regards,
-Chap

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2025-06-02 18:50:06 Re: Correcting freeze conflict horizon calculation
Previous Message Yura Sokolov 2025-06-02 18:28:36 Re: ARM/ARM64 SpinLockAcquire and SpinLockRelease are not full barriers