| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Minor correction in alter_table.sgml |
| Date: | 2016-12-21 20:26:52 |
| Message-ID: | 6824.1482352012@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> So maybe something like
>>
>> All the forms of ALTER TABLE that act on a single table,
>> except RENAME and SET SCHEMA, can be combined into a
>> list of multiple alterations to be applied together.
> Committed and back-patch'd that way.
BTW, so far as the HEAD version of this patch goes, I notice that
ATTACH PARTITION and DETACH PARTITION were recently added to the
list of exceptions. But they're not exceptions according to this
wording: they act on more than one table (the parent and the
partition), no? So we could simplify the sentence some more by
removing them again.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2016-12-21 21:14:23 | Re: Measuring replay lag |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-12-21 20:06:53 | Re: Minor correction in alter_table.sgml |