Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs
Date: 2018-08-14 20:02:00
Message-ID: 67f63434-c54b-014c-6f7a-8546e4e2dc68@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

What should we do with the use of the keyword PROCEDURE in the CREATE
OPERATOR and CREATE TRIGGER syntaxes?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nico Williams 2018-08-14 20:18:03 Re: libpq should not look up all host addresses at once
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2018-08-14 19:54:40 Re: Undocumented(?) limits on regexp functions