| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stefan Keller <sfkeller(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Oleg Ivanov <o(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google) |
| Date: | 2021-04-20 21:49:48 |
| Message-ID: | 676937.1618955388@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stefan Keller <sfkeller(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'd give learned indexes at least a change to provide a
> proof-of-concept. And I want to learn more about the requirements to
> be accepted as a new index (before undergoing month's of code
> sprints).
There's enough support these days that you can build a new index
type as an extension, without touching the core code at all.
I'd advise proceeding that way, at least until you have a pretty
convincing prototype.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-04-20 21:51:32 | Re: ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google) |
| Previous Message | Stefan Keller | 2021-04-20 21:29:43 | Re: ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google) |