From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com> |
Cc: | pghackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling |
Date: | 2000-03-09 01:04:48 |
Message-ID: | 6768.952563888@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com> writes:
>>>> Any suggestions on how I might handle this?
>>
>> Er ... run 7.0beta ?
> Based on recent threads on this list, I have the
> impression that 7.0beta is not quite ready for production.
A fair objection, since in fact it isn't. Moving to 7 now will probably
cost you at least one extra dump/initdb/reload cycle, since we are
likely to force another initdb before final release. However, if the
alternative is continuing to get bit by a 6.5 bug, it seems to me that
being an early adopter of 7.0 is not such a bad choice.
I wouldn't actually suggest picking up 7.0beta1 at this point, since
we've fixed a number of flaws since then; the latest nightly snapshot
would be better. Or you might want to wait for 7.0beta2, which should
be out in a day or two.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2000-03-09 01:10:11 | Re: [HACKERS] regex (from TODO) |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-03-09 00:43:35 | RE: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block |