Re: Hash support for row types

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hash support for row types
Date: 2020-10-20 20:36:25
Message-ID: 676046.1603226185@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Do we need to worry about what happens if somebody modifies the
> opclass/opfamily definitions?

There's a lot of places that you can break by doing that. I'm not
too concerned about it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2020-10-20 22:01:16 Re: CREATE TABLE .. PARTITION OF fails to preserve tgenabled for inherited row triggers
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-10-20 20:20:01 Re: CREATE TABLE .. PARTITION OF fails to preserve tgenabled for inherited row triggers