From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CREATEUSER == SUPERUSER? |
Date: | 2006-01-09 18:45:40 |
Message-ID: | 6756.1136832340@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> The following command makes a superuser. Is this correct?
> template1=# CREATE USER xyz CREATEUSER;
Yes, read the CREATE ROLE documentation:
CREATEUSER
NOCREATEUSER
These clauses are an obsolete, but still accepted, spelling of
SUPERUSER and NOSUPERUSER. Note that they are not equivalent to
CREATEROLE as one might naively expect!
> I think CREATEUSER keyword is equal to CREATEROLE.
The proposed patch breaks backward compatibility, which is the only
reason we still allow these keywords at all.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-09 23:32:48 | Proposed patch to change "missing FROM" messages |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-09 18:20:21 | Re: [PATCHES] plpgsql: check domain constraints |