From: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname |
Date: | 2021-10-12 17:38:16 |
Message-ID: | 66BA0AF5-A3EB-4D3D-9B8F-B99AED22F27E@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Oct 12, 2021, at 10:01 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 12:44 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>> You're asking us to imagine a counterfactual. But this counterfactual
>> bug report would have to describe a real practical problem.
>
> Yes. And I think this one should be held to the same standard: \d
> mydb.myschema.mytable not working is potentially a real, practical
> problem. \d sdlgkjdss.dsgkjsk.sdgskldjgds.myschema.mytable not working
> isn't.
I favor restoring the v13 behavior, but I don't think \d mydb.myschema.mytable was ever legitimate. You got exactly the same results with \d nosuchdb.myschema.mytable, meaning the user was given a false sense of security that the database name was being used to fetch the definition from the database they specified.
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-10-12 17:39:29 | Re: refactoring basebackup.c |
Previous Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-10-12 17:18:42 | Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname |