Re: Review: B-Tree emulation for GIN

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: B-Tree emulation for GIN
Date: 2009-01-19 16:35:50
Message-ID: 6681.1232382950@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> I like the fact that this patch does not modify the numeric ADT. It
> still relies on the fact that the numeric type will never make use of
> the minimal varlena struct, however. I bring this up in case someone
> sees it as a problem.

I'm pretty certain I recall Greg Stark recommending that we adopt
something like that as the standard numeric representation of zero.
It didn't get done yet, but it might happen someday.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-01-19 16:38:26 Re: Fixes for compiler warnings
Previous Message Andrew Chernow 2009-01-19 16:26:40 Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed