Re: Identifying function-lookup failures due to argument name mismatches

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 4:01 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> The primary error message is not varying, only the DETAIL/HINT, so
>> I find this concern pretty far-fetched. Also, I believe that the
>> case that the message intends to help with is very common and so
>> it will save a lot of people time, more than enough to outweigh
>> any cases where it's perhaps un-optimal.

> I'm not entirely convinced, but you could well be right. I do like all
> the other detailed diagnostics, I think, I just wasn't sure about that
> one. But I'm not really here to argue, just giving my opinion.

Fair enough. Again, how shall we proceed? What I suggest is to
go ahead and push what I have, and if there's anything that's not
so great, hopefully we'll get feedback about it before v19 is
frozen.

regards, tom lane