Re: Concern about memory management with SRFs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Concern about memory management with SRFs
Date: 2002-08-29 01:50:41
Message-ID: 6618.1030585841@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Is it OK to use fcinfo->flinfo->fn_mcxt as the long term memory
> context or is there a better choice?

That is the correct choice.

> Is funcctx->multi_call_memory_ctx a
> suitable name in place of funcctx->fmctx?

No objection here.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message One Way 2002-08-29 02:00:51 Re: Open 7.3 items
Previous Message Joe Conway 2002-08-29 01:46:55 Re: Concern about memory management with SRFs

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2002-08-29 02:05:55 Re: [GENERAL] worried about PGPASSWORD drop
Previous Message Joe Conway 2002-08-29 01:46:55 Re: Concern about memory management with SRFs