Re: Quick Extensions Question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Quick Extensions Question
Date: 2011-03-03 14:38:39
Message-ID: 6603.1299163119@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Probably in future the standard PLs will be packaged as extensions, and
>> then it will work. The main reason that it won't happen for 9.1 is that
>> right now we require superuser privilege to install an extension, which
>> would be a regression compared to the privilege requirements for
>> installing standard PLs in existing releases. And relaxing that
>> requirement is a research project :-(

> Meanwhile, is it possible to have CREATE LANGUAGE internally register an
> extension? It's a kludge but I somehow though I'd mention it.

Hmmm ... it definitely is a kluge, but ...

You'd need to work out how the CREATE OR REPLACE and DROP cases would
work.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-03-03 14:41:07 Re: aggregate version of first_value function?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-03-03 14:18:38 Re: WAL segments pile up during standalone mode