Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Cc: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, "Stephen R(dot) van den Berg" <srb(at)cuci(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation
Date: 2008-11-25 21:46:39
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> writes:
> What do you dear readers think about the "extension" vocabulary?

+1 ... we should stay away from "package" unless we are going to
implement an Oracle-compatible facility.  Which I don't particularly
wish to do, but we should leave it open for the future.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2008-11-25 22:32:11
Subject: Re: [Fwd: error compiling postgresql with fedora mingw]
Previous:From: Decibel!Date: 2008-11-25 21:10:30
Subject: Re: Column reordering in pg_dump

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group