Re: Gripes about walsender command processing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Gripes about walsender command processing
Date: 2020-09-17 00:36:55
Message-ID: 66005.1600303015@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2020-Sep-16, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Note that your changes need to be backpatched into v13,
>> because AFAICS this code is violating the FE/BE protocol
>> right now --- it's just luck that libpq isn't moaning
>> about extra CommandComplete messages. But I don't think
>> we want to change the ps title behavior in v13 at this
>> late date, so that part should be HEAD-only.

> I pushed to 13, but it's because of the removal of the command tag; the
> duplicate tags we've been sending since 9.3. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Ugh. Well, fixing v13 is an improvement anyway. Thanks!

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-09-17 00:39:52 Re: pgindent vs dtrace on macos
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-09-17 00:34:55 Re: pgindent vs dtrace on macos