| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavlo Golub <pavlo(dot)golub(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH v4] pg_stat_statements: Add last_execution_start column |
| Date: | 2026-06-09 13:16:32 |
| Message-ID: | 65e8c801-7b00-4974-bae3-ac192573f24a@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 13.05.26 16:38, Pavlo Golub wrote:
> Rebased on current master (a3e6beba60e).
>
> The only conflict was with commit 66366217822 (pg_stat_statements: Set
> PlannedStmt to NULL after nested utility execution), which introduced a
> local copy of pstmt->planOrigin and then nulled pstmt. The patch context
> line was updated to reference saved_planOrigin instead. No functional
> changes from v3.
>
> All pg_stat_statements regression tests pass (16/16).
>
> v4 patch attached.
Here is a summary of the feedback comments we discussed at pgconf.dev:
(Some of these might have applied to previous patch versions.)
technical:
- obvious concerns: getting current time is expensive (inside spinlock!)
- documenting intended use of the field is good, I would put that back
- issues with long-running queries, start time vs. end time -- ignores
analytics use cases
- argument total_time of pgss_store() is not documented, should be fixed
first -- also why is this double??
- issues with extended query protocol can be surprising
- comment says it can be executed under spinlock but then it's not
- only top-level statements? -- not acceptable IMO
code style:
- INT64CONST is useless
- when changing "two" to "three" in a comment, just delete the number
meta/process:
- good: patch versioned, commit message up to date
- I confused me that a new thread was started in the middle of the
discussion.
- As a theoretical committer, I would like to get Sami's and Christoph's
feedback on the latest patch version.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2026-06-09 13:31:01 | Re: PG19 FK fast path: OOB write and missed FK checks during batched |
| Previous Message | Ilia Evdokimov | 2026-06-09 12:39:09 | Re: Extended statistics improvement: multi-column MCV missing values |