Re: Asynchronous MergeAppend

From: Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Asynchronous MergeAppend
Date: 2026-11-03 10:04:17
Message-ID: 65d83013f4333191658885ee9bf578bc@postgrespro.ru
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Etsuro Fujita писал(а) 2026-11-03 05:20:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2026 at 3:58 PM Alexander Pyhalov
> <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>> Etsuro Fujita писал(а) 2026-11-01 20:44:
>> > I also tweaked the comments a bit further.
>
>> + * requestor for a preceding subplan is currently
>> in-progress. Skip
>> + * the configuration even in the MergeAppend case; in
>> that case just
>> + * difer the configuration until the caller processes
>> the request(s)
>> + * for the preceding subplan(s).
>> */
>>
>> s/difer/defer/
>
> Sorry, Fixed.
> ...

Hi.
The last version of the patch seems good to me.
--
Best regards,
Alexander Pyhalov,
Postgres Professional

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2026-11-03 10:11:21 Re: ICU fixed digit reordering bug
Previous Message Ajit Awekar 2026-11-03 09:59:02 Re: [(known) BUG] DELETE/UPDATE more than one row in partitioned foreign table