Re: SQL-standard function body

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function body
Date: 2020-10-10 08:41:09
Message-ID: 65c78917-5221-b3e5-87a1-be9ce55e7c14@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-09-29 07:42, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 08:00:08AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Some conflicts have emerged, so here is an updated patch.
>>
>> I have implemented/fixed the inlining of set-returning functions written in
>> the new style, which was previously marked TODO in the patch.
>
> The CF bot is telling that this patch fails to apply. Could you send
> a rebase?

Here is a rebase, no functionality changes.

As indicated earlier, I'll also send some sub-patches as separate
submissions.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-SQL-standard-function-body.patch text/plain 84.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2020-10-10 08:49:01 Make LANGUAGE SQL the default
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2020-10-10 05:25:25 Re: SEARCH and CYCLE clauses