Re: Regarding fillfactor use case for only delete ops

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Durgamahesh Manne <maheshpostgres9(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Regarding fillfactor use case for only delete ops
Date: 2025-06-06 12:57:02
Message-ID: 65a54f809d0339d9d6021c35f7fa14fc20a7f2e6.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 2025-06-06 at 14:10 +0530, Durgamahesh Manne wrote:
> Can we generate a fill factor for tables that have delete ops ?
>
> Does the fill factor really work and help to minimize the bloat for tables that have delete ops?
>
> I have parent table with weekly partitions So for every week 50 to 60 gb of bloat generates and autovacuum params already in place for child tables 

Nothing can ever avoid bloat caused by DELETE, except partitioning in a
way that you can drop a partition rather than running DELETE.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2025-06-06 13:59:14 Re: Regarding fillfactor use case for only delete ops
Previous Message Arnold Hendriks 2025-06-06 09:16:15 Low OIDs (< 16384) when creating databases in single user mode