Re: Added the word TODO in comments

From: "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PGSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Added the word TODO in comments
Date: 2007-01-01 07:24:52
Message-ID: 65937bea0612312324i1d5044edg67e13ced75baac4a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The comment, "This should be improved someday" sure sounds like a TODO to
me.

I don't know if it should make it to the TODO doc, as that lists
high-level/abstract feature-request-like items.

Probably I should stop acting on impulse here. Hey, can someone around here
lend me his rock!! ( no offence intended :)

Best wishes to all in the new year...

Best regards,

--
gurjeet[(dot)singh](at)EnterpriseDB(dot)com
singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com

On 12/31/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > This just so that somebody looking for TODO items in the source can find
> > this one too.
>
> If you're looking for TODO items, why wouldn't you be looking in the
> TODO document?
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2007-01-01 14:26:14 Request for review: tsearch2 patch
Previous Message Gurjeet Singh 2007-01-01 07:13:10 Re: A possible TODO item