| From: | "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gregory Maxwell" <gmaxwell(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PGSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8 |
| Date: | 2006-10-22 14:46:46 |
| Message-ID: | 65937bea0610220746h6308be1ey3fe8bcba04774717@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/22/06, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Opteron 265 his test code shows SB8 (the intel alg) is 2.48x faster
> for checksum and 1.95x faster for verify for the 800 * 1024 blocks of
> 1 KB each workload. For 100000 blocks of 8k I got simmlar results as
> well.
I think you meant
800*1024 blocks of 1 >MB< each workload.
--
gurjeet[(dot)singh](at)EnterpriseDB(dot)com
singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-10-22 14:51:40 | Re: estimated_count() implementation |
| Previous Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2006-10-22 14:40:56 | Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8 |