Re: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2
Date: 1999-03-25 15:23:16
Message-ID: 6591.922375396@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at> writes:
> 5. Actually postgresql has behaved in this manner because of certain
> "bugs" in the optimizer. Recently a lot of those "bugs" have been
> identified and "fixed", thus destroying the defacto rule based
> behavior.

That's a real good point --- I think we've already heard a couple of
complaints about the new optimizer doing "silly" things that it didn't
use to do.

I repeat my proposal: CREATE TABLE should insert a default size (say
about 1000 tuples) into pg_class.reltuples, rather than inserting 0.
That way, the optimizer will only choose small-table-oriented plans
if the table has actually been verified to be small by vacuum.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-03-25 15:58:01 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-03-25 15:18:19 Re: [HACKERS] connection user