Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg
Date: 2018-03-16 00:46:39
Message-ID: 657be73a-a21d-0ae1-5c62-870afbdfddd4@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/11/2018 12:10 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
> ...
>
> Yeah, seems fine to me. I wonder what else would be needed before
> switching the patch to RFC. I plan to do that after a bit more
> testing sometime early next week, unless someone objects.
>

I've done more testing on this patch, and I haven't found any new issues
with it, so PFA I'm marking it as ready for committer.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-03-16 00:51:25 Re: handling of heap rewrites in logical decoding
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2018-03-16 00:43:23 Re: Failed to request an autovacuum work-item in silence