| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command |
| Date: | 2023-10-01 18:50:15 |
| Message-ID: | 657059eb-5a9c-0762-ea25-682944deca66@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 22.04.23 01:07, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 03:13:04PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2023-03-01 14:47:51 -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>>> Here is an attempt at adding a signal safe function for writing to STDERR.
>>
>> Cool.
>
> I'm gently bumping this thread to see if anyone had additional feedback on
> the proposed patches [0]. The intent was to back-patch these as needed and
> to pursue a long-term fix in v17. Are there any concerns with that?
>
> [0] https://postgr.es/m/20230301224751.GA1823946%40nathanxps13
Is this still being contemplated? What is the status of this?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-10-01 18:53:23 | Re: Evaluate arguments of correlated SubPlans in the referencing ExprState |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2023-10-01 18:46:02 | Re: [PATCH] Clarify the behavior of the system when approaching XID wraparound |