Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0

From: "Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: "Andreas Joseph Krogh" <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Date: 2010-01-22 00:09:30
Message-ID: 647f377d61a41957c9cbff32d3fee8b8.squirrel@webmail.lerctr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers


On Thu, January 21, 2010 5:53 pm, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> On Thursday 21. January 2010 10.37.41 Dave Page wrote:
>> In an attempt to pre-empt the normally drawn-out discussions about
>> what the next version of PostgreSQL will be numbered. the core team
>> have discussed the issue and following a lenghty debate lasting
>> literally a few minutes decided that the next release shall be....
>>
>> Wait for it....
>>
>> 9.0.
>
> Care to shed some light on what features (yes, we users care about
> features) warrant this major version-bump? Is there a link somewhere?
AFAIR, it was stated if Hot Standby AND Streaming Replication hit the
tree, the release number would go to 9.0.

Both are in the tree.

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-01-22 00:22:09 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Previous Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2010-01-21 23:53:21 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-01-22 00:11:10 Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2010-01-21 23:55:06 Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)