| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_statistic_ext.staenabled might not be the best column name |
| Date: | 2017-04-13 16:17:37 |
| Message-ID: | 6471.1492100257@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 4/13/17 08:37, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> We have a bunch of > 3-character prefixes already: amop*, amproc*,
>> enum*, cast*. But I think I nevertheless like "ste" better.
> "stx" perhaps?
> I would also be in favor of changing it to something other than "sta".
"stx" sounds pretty good to me --- it seems like e.g. "stxkind" is
more visibly distinct from "stakind" than "stekind" would be.
Any objections out there?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-04-13 16:25:06 | Re: Undefined psql variables |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-04-13 16:13:30 | Re: Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded) |