| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Paul Silveira <plabrh1(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psql "SCHEMA" switch |
| Date: | 2006-12-23 03:58:37 |
| Message-ID: | 6459.1166846317@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> writes:
> On Dec 22, 2006, at 15:15 , Paul Silveira wrote:
>> Because psql does not have a schema switch, I had to do it this way...
> As the schema is part of the DDL, I think it's better to have it as
> part of DDL script rather than a switch for psql, either as schema-
> qualified tables in the script or using a SET search_path command in
> the SQL script.
Besides, you can get the effect already via PGOPTIONS:
PGOPTIONS="--search_path=myschema,yourschema" psql ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | org | 2006-12-23 09:59:35 | Clustering & Load Balancing & Replication |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-23 03:31:28 | Re: Problem with index in OR'd expression |