Re: Exposure related to GUC value of ssl_passphrase_command

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: "Moon, Insung" <tsukiwamoon(dot)pgsql(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com, amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Exposure related to GUC value of ssl_passphrase_command
Date: 2020-03-09 02:43:20
Message-ID: 643fd36a-2962-e578-a624-7cc4c886aa67@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/02/14 10:31, Moon, Insung wrote:
> Dear Hackers.
>
> Thank you for an response.
> I registered this entry in commifest of 2020-03.
> # I registered in the security part, but if it is wrong, sincerely
> apologize for this.
>
> And I'd like to review show authority to ssl_ * later and discuss it
> in a separate thread.

So, you are planning to start new discussion about this?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Advanced Platform Technology Group
Research and Development Headquarters

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2020-03-09 02:43:52 Re: Exposure related to GUC value of ssl_passphrase_command
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-03-09 02:12:03 Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench