Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Date: 2003-09-12 04:00:43
Message-ID: 6423.1063339243@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
>> Please, only the first two. Make the Unixware template add __i386__.
>> Don't add assumptions about valid user-namespace symbols.

> that's reasonable. At least until 64-bit UnixWare. :-)

Even then, I'd prefer to put the necessary kluge into template/unixware
or Makefile.unixware or port/unixware.h, rather than add a risky
assumption globally.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2003-09-12 04:02:02 Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2003-09-12 03:52:03 Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2003-09-12 04:02:02 Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2003-09-12 03:52:03 Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines