| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Vik Reykja <vikreykja(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Draft release notes complete |
| Date: | 2012-05-10 15:04:47 |
| Message-ID: | 642.1336662287@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> When we did the 9.1 release notes, reviewers weren't credited, and I
> sort of assumed that policy would be the same this time around.
Yes. This seems to be a policy change that was made without notice or
discussion, and I personally don't find it to be a good idea. I think
the release notes should only credit the primary author(s) of a feature.
Face it, most people don't care about that, so we should not be
expending much space on it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-05-10 15:04:54 | Re: checkpointer code behaving strangely on postmaster -T |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-05-10 14:58:26 | Re: "pgstat wait timeout" just got a lot more common on Windows |