| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Email issues unanswered |
| Date: | 2007-01-29 23:19:54 |
| Message-ID: | 64196BA371E746FF3C0DCF47@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Monday, January 29, 2007 18:11:38 -0500 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
wrote:
> My long subject email going out looks like:
>
> From bruce Fri Jan 26 21:00:37 2007
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL
> branches
Looks like something has add a carriage return at the end of PostgreSQL, which
breaks the RFC ... if it was all one line (as per the RFC quote that Andrew
sent), it wouldn't have gone through (as per the valid long Subject that I just
sent to you) ...
You are talking about 'multi line' (against RFCs) vs 'long subjects that wrap'
(not against RFCs) ...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFFvoEa4QvfyHIvDvMRArj8AJwMz1g5HHverBOKhDCJvfit2htVdQCcDrQx
Crh1VulXUAfF0A9t6zw0VVI=
=tTPx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2007-01-29 23:23:47 | Re: Email issues unanswered |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-29 23:19:44 | Re: Email issues unanswered |