On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 12:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> ISTM that would be up to the index AM. We'd need some interlocks on
> which index AMs could be used with which table AMs in any case, I
> think.
I'm not sure why? It seems like we should be able to come up with
something that's generic enough.
> I think the hard part may really be in places like tidbitmap.c, which
> one would wish to be AM-independent, but right now it's quite
> specific
> to heap-style TIDs. Maybe we can think of a way to parameterize it.
For my particular AM, being able to have a parameterized granularity
might be nice, but not required.
Regards,
Jeff Davis