From: | Ilia Evdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Geier <geidav(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Use merge-based matching for MCVs in eqjoinsel |
Date: | 2025-09-10 13:56:03 |
Message-ID: | 63b35674-6706-42db-bb8d-92ce03226d12@tantorlabs.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi!
On 09.09.2025 12:22, David Geier wrote:
> Could you please do that with the latest attached patch so that we test
> it once more?
LGTM. Yes, I'll test this patch.
>
> Could you also run once more the JOB benchmark to get some test coverage
> on the SEMI join code (assuming it also uses SEMI joins)?
Unfortunately, the JOB benchmark does not contain semi join nodes.
However, TPC-DS does. I'll look for the queries with slowest planner
times there and check them.
I'll need some time to check both join and semi join cases with small
and large default_statistics_target. I'll share the results later.
>
> Once we've concluded on above and there are no objections, I will
> register this patch in the commit fest.
Sure. No problem.
--
Best regards,
Ilia Evdokimov,
Tantor Labs LLC,
https://tantorlabs.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2025-09-10 14:11:54 | Re: plan shape work |
Previous Message | Natalya Aksman | 2025-09-10 13:52:33 | Re: Adding skip scan (including MDAM style range skip scan) to nbtree |