Re: Location of PG_CATALOG_VERSION

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vicky Vergara <vicky_vergara(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Location of PG_CATALOG_VERSION
Date: 2017-05-22 01:28:17
Message-ID: 63987.1495416497@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Vicky Vergara <vicky_vergara(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> From this message:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1585.1472410329%40sss.pgh.pa.us
> I deduced that in the code I can use
> PG_CATALOG_VERSION

No, sorry, thinko on my part. It's CATALOG_VERSION_NO, from
<catalog/catversion.h>, that people usually use for this sort of thing.
That gives you finer grain than PG_VERSION would, although that only
matters if you're concerned about working with development versions.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-05-22 01:36:40 Fix a typo in hash.c
Previous Message Vicky Vergara 2017-05-22 01:14:08 Location of PG_CATALOG_VERSION