Re: [HACKERS] Unary % operator is broken in current sources

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Unary % operator is broken in current sources
Date: 1999-03-21 02:51:54
Message-ID: 6398.921984714@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> OK, I made the change. It works now with special entries for %4 and 4%
> in the grammer, similar to our handling of -4:

Hmm, is that an adequate solution? Are you sure there are no other
operators like % ?

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-03-21 03:12:50 Re: check_primary_key is busted too
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-03-21 02:25:19 Re: [HACKERS] Unary % operator is broken in current sources