Re: Re: [GENERAL] [Help] Temporary Table: Implicitely created index not shown in \d i

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Itzinger, Oskar" <oitzinger(at)opec(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] [Help] Temporary Table: Implicitely created index not shown in \d i
Date: 2001-06-22 23:17:40
Message-ID: 6394.993251860@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> test=> \d
> No relations found.
> test=> \di
> No relations found.
> test=> \dS
> List of relations
> Name | Type | Owner
> ----------------+----------+----------
> ...
> pg_temp_5396_0 | sequence | postgres
> pg_temp_5396_1 | table | postgres

Hm. Shouldn't psql's \dS ignore temp items, since \d and \di do?
Otherwise this looks pretty good...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-06-22 23:21:19 Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-06-22 23:13:09 Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-06-22 23:22:04 Re: Re: [GENERAL] [Help] Temporary Table: Implicitely created index not shown in \d i
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-22 23:04:19 Re: [GENERAL] [Help] Temporary Table: Implicitely created index not shown in \d i