Re: --with-llvm on 32-bit platforms?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dmitry Mityugov <d(dot)mityugov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: --with-llvm on 32-bit platforms?
Date: 2025-09-15 19:16:21
Message-ID: 638729.1757963781@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dmitry Mityugov <d(dot)mityugov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote 2025-09-15 09:36:
>> It seems plausible that this is related to commit 2a600a93c7b "Make
>> type Datum be 8 bytes wide everywhere.". I don't have any more
>> insights than that.

> Thanks for the hint. I did git bisect, and [ Peter's right ]

Interesting. You have at no point shown any details about what
these failures look like. However, I wonder if it could be
something about broken alignment expectations. The recent
commit 09036dc71 fixed one thing that we'd managed not to notice
in earlier testing, and I can't avoid the suspicion that there's
more.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2025-09-15 19:28:37 Re: index prefetching
Previous Message Greg Burd 2025-09-15 19:03:21 Re: [PATCH] Add tests for Bitmapset